Menu
Home Page

Pupil Premium

Pupil Premium Strategy for Rendlesham Primary School 2017-2018

Rendlesham Primary School Pupil premium strategy statement

  1. Summary information

School

Rendlesham Community Primary School

Academic Year

2017/18

Total PP budget (01/04/17-31/03/18)

£29620

Date of most recent PP Review

31/8/17

Total number of Ever 6 pupils Yr R-6

17

Number of pupils eligible for PP

No. of PP and LAC

4/270

6/270

Attendance of all PP Pupils

TBC

 

  1. Current attainment

1 Child = 17% attainment at the end of 2017 years 4-5 only

Pupils eligible for PP (start 2017)

Pupils not eligible for PP (national average end KS2 2016)

% of KS2 achieving in reading, writing & maths

50% no data 17%

59%

% of KS2 working at age related expectation in reading

50% no data 17%

71%

% of KS2 working at age related expectation in writing

50% no data 17%

78%

% of KS2 working at age related expectation in maths

50% no data 17%

75%

  1. Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)

In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)

  1.  

Level of SEN will mean 17% of pupils never reach age related expectation

  1.  

 

C.

 

External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)

D.

Pupils with CAF support, EHC Plan, EWO support

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Desired outcomes

Success criteria

  1.  

Where current attainment is not in line with starting points raise attainment in reading

Increase attainment in reading to 67% and increase GDS from 17% to 34%

 

 

  1.  

Where current attainment is not in line with starting points raise attainment in writing

Increase % of pupils at GDS in writing from 17% to 34%

  1.  

accelerated progress of child entering Reception from baseline to ELG

Need baseline data to be able to set targets – to be completed in Autumn

  1.  

Increase attainment for Ever 6 pupils

KS1 child achieves expected at end of key stage in RWM

KS2 pupils achieve expected at the end of the key stage in writing and maths

 

           

 

  1. Planned expenditure
  • Academic year

2017/2018

The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies

  1. Extra-Curricular Support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

To enable pupils to access peripatetic tuition

Support with external fees up to £200/child per term

Pupils demonstrate enthusiasm and ability in creative arts

Feedback to staff from peripatetic teacher and whole school performances

Music Coordinator

Termly

To enable pupils to take part in school visits/residential trips

Support with costs up to £100 / pupil

To allow equal opportunity for all pupils

Track participation of pupils eligible

School Business Manager

Termly

Total budgeted cost

£ 600/term

  1. Targeted support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

Raise attainment in literacy in KS2 pupils

Qualified teacher to teach small group including pp children 2 hours /week

Accelerated progress seen last year through quality teaching and feedback

Tracking of pupils

Liaison between staff fundamental for progression of skills

J Maghoo

S Roper

End Autumn Term

Cost £ 688.22

Raise attainment in maths in KS2 pupils

Qualified teacher to teach small group including PP children 1 hr /day 4 x week

Small group tuition and teaching from a qualified teacher are proven to be more effective than TA support

Planning to be in line with rest of year group

Tracking of group termly

D Scurrell / F Stocker

End Autumn Term

Cost £1270.56

Total budgeted cost

£1960/term

  1. Other approaches

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

Target ever 6 pupils to raise attainment in RWM

Qualified teacher to teach small group

Small group tuition and teaching from a qualified teacher are proven to be more effective than TA support

Tracking of group

D Thomas

End Autumn term £2860/term

Target vulnerable learners across the school in RWM

Qualified teachers to teach targeted children in small groups for 12 hours per week per term

Pupils identified as vulnerable are not making expected progress from their starting point and need support to reach their potential

Tracking on a termly basis

All staff have vulnerable pupils identified in their classes

Small groups are taught same curriculum but with greater depth of feedback

D Thomas

End Autumn term

£3820/term.

Total budgeted cost

£6680/term

Total planned termly spend

£9240

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Review of expenditure

Previous Academic Year

 

  1. Extra-Curricular Support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned

(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

To enable pupils to access peripatetic tuition

Support with external fees up to £200/child per term

 

 

 

To enable pupils to take part in school visits/residential trips

Support with costs up to £100 / pupil

 

 

 

  1. Targeted support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned

(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

Raise attainment in literacy in KS2 pupils

Qualified teacher to teach small group including pp children 2 hours /week

 

 

 

Raise attainment in maths in KS2 pupils

Qualified teacher to teach small group including PP children 1 hr /day 4 x week

 

 

 

  1. Other approaches

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned

(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

Target ever 6 pupils to raise attainment in RWM

Qualified teacher to teach small group

 

 

 

Target vulnerable learners across the school in RWM

Qualified teachers to teach targeted children in small groups for 12 hours per week per term

 

 

 

  1. Additional detail

In this section you can annex or refer to additional information which you have used to support the sections above.

Our current number of pupils eligible for PP funding is 2% of our school population 1 child in EYFS and five children in years 4and 5 only

Due to the small number of pupils and the level of SEN within this group, our results will always be erratic, with one child equalling 17%.

Therefore the school has personalised case studies for each child where tracking is more detailed. This enables Senior leaders to monitor attainment, progress and personal circumstances at a more in depth level but maintains the anonymity of our pupils when reporting to governors and parents.

 

 

Top